- #Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition how to#
- #Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition software#
- #Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition plus#
The box's resources to the BI workload, knowing that it would be grossly under-utilized most of the time. Therefore, you needed to make available all That was because the BI workload can vary from a few percent of a machine's capacity all the way up to maxing out even a biggish box, in just a few seconds. "Ībout eighteen months ago, I wrote a paper called " Don't Virtualize yourīI" which said that the traditional reason for virtualization - multi-system load-sharing to use up resources in a relatively much bigger box - was exactly Or maybe they had never even heard of Bill Baker? Maybe the licensing guysĭidn't know what people like Bill Baker was saying when he talked about Microsoft's effort to " do a lot to accelerate the adoption of Business Indeed, I cannot see a situation where BI Edition is ever going to be cheaper than Enterprise, for a reasonable size organization, where 'a user is someone who might potentially use business intelligence'.ĭunno what Microsoft was thinking about, really. Enterprise becomes way cheaper than the BI Edition. Of potential CALs would be stratospheric. As well, that kind of organization is the size of a hospital - or maybe bigger - and thus the number/cost
![cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition](https://softwarekeep.s3.amazonaws.com/softwarekeep_eu/1800x/3/4/34_-_microsoft_sql_server_2000_enterprise_edition.png)
Of course, when there's an EAP scheme in place, the cost of Enterprise can drop so much that it becomes cost-effective at a really low number of CALs. You want full-tilt, you hold your nose and go Enterprise (and you can do Pervasive Business Intelligence, just like Microsoft said to do, when they published the Business Week report on the value of same).
#Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition plus#
You want cheap and cheerful, you go Standard plus third-party tools for your self-service. Given that, I can't see a situation where it's ever cost-effective to get the BI Edition. Offset by the fact that Enterprise is only available via the per-core model. You make a sound point regarding a CAL being 'personal', allowing each user to access every SQL Server licensed Server+CAL. Not the total number of people who might ever connect to the business intelligence instance. Īctual concurrent authenticated connections that is being licensed, Is is possible someone could confirm my understanding, please? Which is. For human operated devices such as PCs or hand-held terminals, a user CAL or device CAL can be used." Require device CALs, even when connecting to SQL Server indirectly. That is very clear in the licensing reference guide where it says "Devices not operated by humans If I had 10 point-of-sale terminals, I'd have 10 device CALs, no matter how many sales people I had. The consequence is that I could have a pool of 20 users, working in 2 shifts of 10, and I would need 10 CALs as I only have 10 authenticated users connecting to SQL Server at any one each authenticated connection that is what's being licensed. To access a server running SQL Server 2012 software, a user needs a SQL Server 2012 CAL."Īccess i.e.
![cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition](http://dbatricksworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/SQL_2012_licence_15.png)
#Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition software#
"To access a licensed SQL Server, each user or device must have a SQL Server CAL that is the same version or newer than the SQL Server software version being accessed. The Business Intelligence Edition uses the Server plus CAL model.
#Cost of sql server 2012 enterprise edition how to#
but it's not clear to me how to license it. Moving to SQL Server 2012 is a good thing.